From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d89b08801f2aacae
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-03 01:44:42 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!easynet-tele!easynet-melon!easynet.net!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is strong typing worth the cost?
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 08:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnad4jfn.1ps.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <Xns9200929868B11derekknosofcouk@62.253.162.107>
 <3CCEB246.9090009@worldnet.att.net>
 <Xns9200B524E1781derekknosofcouk@62.253.162.109>
 <slrnactqh7.2qr.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <slrnacts3r.2qr.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <aamua0$hnd$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <uwuuouuwi.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <3CCFFB7F.B8080F7A@despammed.com> <3CD1608B.A6336379@despammed.com>
 <3CD16D9E.912B1659@lmtas.lmco.com>
 <slrnad313f.99k.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <oc23du0f8odeor9072kfrs3679l5v4q1j2@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1020415481 6818 129.241.83.78 (3 May 2002 08:44:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 08:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23476
Date: 2002-05-03T08:44:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 02 May 2002 14:48:16 -0400, Dan Nagle wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Better, use the Mil-Std-1753 (sp?) implicit none statement.
> 
> De facto standard due to the necessity of the military market.

Don't have it. We have a NAG F90 compiler only.

Preben