From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,41100a78496a4c71
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-04 08:19:04 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!news.algonet.se!algonet!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Nethack! (was): AdaGames
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnaaov7l.7vc.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <98104da8.0203280310.143a1c18@posting.google.com>
 <fa07dbfec5dad2d0a41625ebfeda3720.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <4519e058.0203290613.73b55af4@posting.google.com>
 <6g4gaugv9a85i56kvgcgmu4h2jkjprutec@4ax.com>
 <4519e058.0204010704.ed2cd06@posting.google.com>
 <entiau0hu5ood9gtg5hkfds6vbtnut1qjk@4ax.com>
 <4519e058.0204021030.14127b06@posting.google.com>
 <slrnaaljn7.22e.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <4519e058.0204030750.78a30287@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1017937143 20928 129.241.83.78 (4 Apr 2002
 16:19:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22099
Date: 2002-04-04T16:19:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 3 Apr 2002 07:50:45 -0800, Ted Dennison wrote:
> Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message news:<slrnaaljn7.22e.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>...
>> On 2 Apr 2002 10:30:14 -0800, Ted Dennison wrote:
>> > Interesting. I usually use "grep -c ";"" for SLOC counting. "wc -l"
>> 
>> shouldn't it be: grep -ce ";$" so you don't get all the semicolons in
>> the definitions of functions/procedures?
> 
> For me no, for two reasons:
> 
>   1) It can be argued that defining the interface elemets for
> subprograms is work on the same scale as any other ";"-ed line.
>   2) ";$" (semi's at the end of the line, for those who don't speak
> sed) doesn't get rid of them all anyway. In my code, it wouldn't be
> likely to get rid of *any*, as I always put only one formal parameter
> definition on a line.
>   3) "-c" only counts the *lines* where it appears, not the number of
> appearances. Thus even if ";$" *did* skip some single-line parameter
> definitions, the resulting count would end up nearly the same.

Yes and also you loose for:

   if sth then
   elsif sth then
   else
   end if;

This would be 1, but it should be 3 ? I'm not sure how a SLOC is
defined.

Preben