From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-30 06:02:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!news.algonet.se!algonet!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!newsfeed01.nntp.se.dataphone.net!nntp.se.dataphone.net!news.powertech.no!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ? Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 14:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3CA48637.C5C4DEF5@despammed.com> <5C0p8.2$qt3.190@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net> <3CA5B465.6F017DFD@btinternet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1017496948 28324 129.241.83.82 (30 Mar 2002 14:02:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 14:02:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21890 Date: 2002-03-30T14:02:28+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC), tony wrote: > WJT wrote: >> >> "Preben Randhol" wrote in message >> news:slrnaa97pv.s2.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no... >> > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:27:45 GMT, WJT wrote: >> > >> > > make Ada his own, besides that I believe that MS is starting to >> understand >> > > the benefits of ISO standardization. They have submitted C# and >> Besides this is Ada, if you architect you system correctly you should be >> isolating you 'dependent things' into layers and subsystems and keeping the >> rest of you application true and ...Green. >> >> > -- >> > Preben Randhol �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.� > > Agreed but isn't it fairly easy (courtesy of David Botton) to produce > internet server applications for windows clients, already without > touching .NET. > > still such an effort to produce .NET for ada (or is it the other way > round) can only progress both our community and enhance the reliability > of using .NET. > > This is to be at least gently admired........... I didn't write that you quoted above. Pleace quote correctly. -- Preben Randhol �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�