From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-23 04:34:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!deine.net!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Operating System Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3C88E0D1.89161C16@despammed.com> <3C9514DD.9CF1F84A@san.rr.com> <99da9u0909rsblfdcc1ru7jd2r9q461qhk@4ax.com> <436o9uc7jg590rv5rb1l9v6be8vk49s278@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1016886868 5755 129.241.83.82 (23 Mar 2002 12:34:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:34:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21578 Date: 2002-03-23T12:34:28+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 00:06:58 -0600, James Ross wrote: > I'll agree with that to a point. A very secure OS should have an > "unsafe" mode where all bets are off -- do whatever you want. However, > under normal conditions no foot wounding allowed. How can it the be a secure OS if half the applications you are using are unsecure? -- Preben Randhol �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�