From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,345a8b767542016e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-16 07:51:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: memory leakages with Ada? Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3c90af1e@news.starhub.net.sg> <3c91bfa3.1987537@news.demon.co.uk> <3pm69u85j4h7efndahkean6trom5utk21m@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1016293865 22657 129.241.83.82 (16 Mar 2002 15:51:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21335 Date: 2002-03-16T15:51:05+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:56:41 -0500, DPH wrote: > > this goes back to a post I made last month. I'm just wondering if Ada > is all that much less error prone when you start comparing it with C++ > development environments in the wildly popular platforms of Windows > and Linux, but especially windows. There are just scads of tools to > do about everything (except reliably find the memory leaks of C++, > although there may be - and I just haven't run across it yet) and > those tools are generally cheaper due to economy of scale. Ask yourself: Why do so many tools exist for C++? -- Preben Randhol �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�