From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,28dcfc3d6dc519b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-14 04:46:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!lutz From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Renaming subprogram and default_expression Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <87sn84i80s.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1013690774 3132 217.17.192.37 (14 Feb 2002 12:46:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:46:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19999 Date: 2002-02-14T12:46:14+00:00 List-Id: * Florian Weimer wrote: >Christoph Grein writes: >> So it looks OK. Did some compiler complain? > >GNAT 3.14p and GNAT 5.00w, both with the same, confusing error >message: 'default expression for "X" does not match'. Initial program to reproduce this error in 3.13p. May it help you. procedure Defaults is type Typ is new Integer; procedure Original (X : Typ); procedure Renamed (X : Typ := -2); procedure Renamed (X : Typ := -3) renames Original; procedure Original (X : Typ) is begin null; end Original; begin null; end Defaults;