From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,c887193050c097ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-08 04:07:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem with GNAT modified GPL and SourceForge Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1013170016 9194 129.241.83.82 (8 Feb 2002 12:06:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:06:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19765 Date: 2002-02-08T12:06:56+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:59:38 -0800 (PST), Eric Merritt wrote: > This doesnt make any sense. I have a project a > sourceforge based in Ada that is under the modified > GPL. I think the only diffrence is that I labeled it > as 'Other/Proprietary License'. They had no issue with > it at all. I don't think it is so nice, because a lot of people will be likely not to accept other licenses than GPL compliant licenses. The GMGPL is in effect the same as GPL apart from the extra freedom added by it. -- Preben Randhol �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�