From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,c887193050c097ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-07 07:15:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem with GNAT modified GPL and SourceForge Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3C625604.1C948A06@gmx.de> <4519e058.0202070651.926c0bf@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1013094911 592 129.241.83.82 (7 Feb 2002 15:15:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:15:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19710 Date: 2002-02-07T15:15:11+00:00 List-Id: On 7 Feb 2002 06:51:58 -0800, Ted Dennison wrote: > Steffen Huber wrote in message news:<3C625604.1C948A06@gmx.de>... >> 3.) Convince OSI to add the GMGPL as an approved licence - anyone tried >> that? > > However, it looks like they have a mailing list to handle license > discussion now (see http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html ), > so it shouldn't be so tough to get discussion about it anymore. But > OSI's kind of a joke these days anyway. Is there somebody who wants to do it? I mean instead of that 5 of us all send e-mail asking for GMGPL be certified, it would be better if one did it. -- Preben Randhol �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�