From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c08a75c896c3685f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-21 14:41:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.net.uni-c.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Style Guide reference - subprogram/variable name lengths Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3c4c22f2@pull.gecm.com> <3c4c3119$2@pull.gecm.com> <3c4c4475$1@pull.gecm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1011652903 7563 129.241.83.82 (21 Jan 2002 22:41:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:41:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19157 Date: 2002-01-21T22:41:43+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:27:31 -0000, martin.m.dowie wrote: > My original question was - the Ada Quality and Style Guide > references Schneiderman's "The Territory, Paths and Destinations" > and in particular cites it for not using 'too long' identifiers. But > having trawled google et al I can't find this paper on any internet > site. Can anyone give a brief explanation of what the paper says > and what the maximum length he determined should be? (Try yahoo first it uses google if it cannot find anything interesting.) >From the authors home page: 86-02 Shneiderman, B. (Feb. 1986) Empirical studies of programmers: the territory, paths, and destinations, keynote address for workshop, Empirical Studies of Programmers, E. Soloway & R. Iyengar, Eds., Ablex (June 1986) 1-12. CS-TR-1623 , CAR-TR-187 [Abstract] Abstract Information: * This paper attempts to describe the varied intellectual territory that programmers work in. It offers several paths for researchers who wish to explore this territory: controlled experiments, observational or field studies, surveys, and cognitive theories. Finally, this paper suggests several important destinations for researchers: refining the use of current languages, imporving present and future languages, developing special purpose languages, and improving tools and methods. Unless somebody has this article at hand, I think you have to go visit your nearest university (or other) library. Usually articles available on-line does not date so far back, besides you need a library to access these sites. Preben -- () Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights. '||} {||' http://www.amnesty.org/