From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fe14052055b4b0bf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-03 07:38:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.net.uni-c.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.02 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <20020102140849.2bb221a5.nospam@attbi.com> <87sn9o1l4f.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1010072333 16714 129.241.83.82 (3 Jan 2002 15:38:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18479 Date: 2002-01-03T15:38:53+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:27:18 GMT, Ted Dennison wrote: > In article , Preben > Randhol says... >>But I would rather have a tested gcc-gnat out in a while than something >>ASAP that might be bugging and thus give gcc-gnat a bad rep. > > True. But if its a 3.1 distro, the other stuff is just as liable to be buggy. Yes -- () Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights. '||} {||' http://www.amnesty.org/