From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5556ca7de188d5ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-14 01:46:51 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!lutz
From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Multidimensional array vs. array of array
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:45:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
Message-ID: <slrna1jihg.ke.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
References: <slrna1d1o8.7nl.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
 <u3d2hl5pk.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <slrna1e5tv.kc.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <3C17F5BF.AEBE40C3@worldnet.att.net> <slrna1grlf.k1.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <9vb864$e8rbj$3@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de
X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1008323121 6392 217.17.192.37 (14 Dec 2001
 09:45:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:45:21 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17901
Date: 2001-12-14T09:45:21+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Nick Roberts wrote:
>Does this help at all?

Yes, but I perfer a differnt approach: Returning a record containing a
multidimensional array, define an constraint array of array type from the
constraint result (ws : Workspace := Init_Workspace; type ... ws.length;),
converting (copy) the multidimensional array to a variable of the new type
and work with this new type. This is reasonable, because the following
computations are much slower, than the conversion itself.