From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d575f572a099528
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-07 10:50:13 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is faster Ada or C?
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:50:11 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrna123nh.6ju.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <3c08314d$0$158$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de>
 <a8MO7.46831$xS6.76121@www.newsranger.com> <3C0BA624.7A12BFA1@boeing.com>
 <3C10C26B.AA451459@nbi.dk> <u1yi6rjbh.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1007751011 15634 129.241.83.82 (7 Dec 2001
 18:50:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:50:11 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17602
Date: 2001-12-07T18:50:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 07 Dec 2001 19:12:02 +0100, Pascal Obry wrote:
> - GNAT 5.0

Is this the cvs version of Gnat with gcc 3.0?

> 
> I'm not an expert here but I think most of the difference between the C++ and
> Ada version is in the way Sqrt is implemented. Ada put some constraints on the
> Sqrt accuracy.
> 
> Anyway here the difference is not as big as what you have reported.

Well that depends on the gcc version of GNAT 5.0

-- 
 ()   Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.
'||}
{||'                                           http://www.amnesty.org/