From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,874959b8413ac400 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-19 02:05:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Book to learn GtkAda Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <9qn2t5$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1003482299 6683 129.241.83.82 (19 Oct 2001 09:04:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:04:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14930 Date: 2001-10-19T09:04:59+00:00 List-Id: On 18 Oct 2001 17:18:29 GMT, David Starner wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:58:37 +0000 (UTC), Preben Randhol wrote: >>> Btw: Would it be possible and even make sense to create an Ada binding >>> for Qt? >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtada/ > > Read the page; its goal is to produce a clone, not a binding. It's also > in the planning stage, not anything useful. Where did I say that it was a binding, or useful? I just supplied a link that might be interesting. Personally I don't see the reason for making a clone of the qt library, but others might. Preben