From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-16 06:55:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!lutz From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada vs. cpp Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <9q7na102nqn@drn.newsguy.com> <3BCBF40A.BBDD4FE6@free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1003240484 13570 217.17.192.37 (16 Oct 2001 13:54:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14675 Date: 2001-10-16T13:54:44+00:00 List-Id: * Ted Dennison wrote: >In article <3BCBF40A.BBDD4FE6@free.fr>, Jean-Marc Bourguet says... >>This is not a standard conforming implementation which requires: >> >>sizeof(char) = 1 > >Which standard are you talking about? I'm pretty sure there is no such >requirement for K&R C compilers. I already quoted the C99 (X3J11) requirement.