From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-11 05:40:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.27.83.146!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!lutz From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it? Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <9q25ec0248o@drn.newsguy.com> <9q421v0bbg@drn.newsguy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1002804037 4121 217.17.192.37 (11 Oct 2001 12:40:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:40:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14248 Date: 2001-10-11T12:40:37+00:00 List-Id: * Robert*@ wrote: >As was said many times, object.method() vs. method(object); is only >syntax, but it is an important syntax difference. Oops? >We can argue this for many years to come. Technical discussions on this >mean very little any more. At the end of the day, if you want more people >to use Ada, Ada must implements the class construct and allow programmers >to use object.method(). I do not want people to use Ada if they do not like it. They will find a grain of salt in every line and spread bad rumors about this language.