From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38ceb882eed41e1e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-11 02:30:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.27.83.146!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!lutz From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Size and pack Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <9ff447f2.0110100005.2503bb00@posting.google.com> <9ff447f2.0110102224.5c470e2c@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1002792603 30837 217.17.192.37 (11 Oct 2001 09:30:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:30:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14232 Date: 2001-10-11T09:30:03+00:00 List-Id: * Adrian Hoe wrote: >lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote in message news:... >> - If you need a special layout (i.e. for interfacing), >> use record representation clauses. > >The record structure will be used to interface with COTS product which >sends out data in specific byte orders. The shuffle is not viable in >this case. So use record representation clauses. >This will be intended on 32-bit Intel. What will be the effect if I >use representation clauses on 64-bit processor? With record representation clauses (including Bit_Order definitions) you can expect portable access.