From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5867ff5404195f0e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-09 11:49:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!lutz From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 18:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <3BBA9724.2020009@earthlink.net> <5ee5b646.0110030812.d2ad098@posting.google.com> <3BBBCF3B.9050403@earthlink.net> <5ee5b646.0110090930.5274699a@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: belenus.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1002653315 23945 217.17.192.34 (9 Oct 2001 18:48:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 18:48:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14072 Date: 2001-10-09T18:48:35+00:00 List-Id: * Robert Dewar wrote: >Good to hear that you got a clean build. Today I managed a full bootstrap and build even the libs without any problem. Linking a small example to the real executable works. Example does the requested job. I'm missing gnatmake ;-/. >Remember to report any problems to report@gnat.com (you can also use the >standard gcc process), but errors reported to CLA go into the ether :-) I do not report errors without a detailed reproducable example. I'd like to inform cla about the success and good quality. (Small examples tend to grow in Size and Time when switching on optimization, because all working data is required to go though CPU registers even if this is not necessary.)