From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-05 06:09:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada vs. cpp Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 13:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3BBCE2C5.871889DC@nbi.dk> <9pk9sm$96p$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1002287372 8571 129.241.83.82 (5 Oct 2001 13:09:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 13:09:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13779 Date: 2001-10-05T13:09:32+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:43:02 +0000 (UTC), Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Preben Randhol wrote: > >: Problem with Perl is that even with only 100 characters you will run a >: great risk of making a lot of errors. > > What kind of, given -w and the 'use strict ...' mechanisms? One of the bigger problems is to know exactly how to get the output of an function into the right variable and not have to rely on the default every time. But whether -w or not, Perl code still reminds unreadable... Preben