From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-04 15:52:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!129.240.148.23!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada vs. cpp Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 22:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3BBCE2C5.871889DC@nbi.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1002235946 13583 129.241.83.82 (4 Oct 2001 22:52:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 22:52:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13752 Date: 2001-10-04T22:52:26+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:29:25 +0200, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: > Pascal: > >> Perl is the worst nightmare for any sized project. > > I would say that it isn't all that bad for tasks which can > be implemented with less than hundred characters. Problem with Perl is that even with only 100 characters you will run a great risk of making a lot of errors. Of course a true Perl coder is more interested in how to write the whole program in as few lines as possible. > "Dansk sprogn�vn er en flok spader! > Cognac kan kun staves p� �n m�de" Konjakk ? ;-) > Henrik Christian Grove