From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac193220dd94f402 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-09 03:28:05 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!proxad.net!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!news.tele.dk!195.161.0.180!newsfeed.rt.ru!news.algonet.se!algonet!uninett.no!ntnu.no!randhol+abuse From: randhol+abuse@pvv.org (Preben Randhol) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and Database Date: 9 Jan 2001 11:25:09 GMT Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: kopp.stud.ntnu.no 979039509 21883 129.241.83.82 (9 Jan 2001 11:25:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jan 2001 11:25:09 GMT User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3802 Date: 2001-01-09T11:25:09+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:47:16 +0000 (WET), Mario Amado Alves wrote: >--...compatibility is defined as a license that does not "impose any >further restrictions". Yes the GPL is compatible with itself in this sense, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >--Hmmm... So a license slightly more restrictive than GPL may be ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >--You are probably right. What I meant is an _open_source_ license (e.g. >Ad=AAlib's) slightly more restrictive than GPL may be compatible with GPL.= Remember a open source licenses does not mean it is a free license. Read: http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/license-list.html and : http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/bsd.html -- Preben Randhol ---------------- http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- iMy favorite editor is Emacs!bcwVim -- vim best-editor.txt