From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8309f2bc055237c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Subject: Re: Bit manipulation Date: 2000/11/15 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 693832590 Distribution: world Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <8u8v6n$b7o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <2WTH$pdrCfOd@eisner.decus.org> <8ub6kt$6nd$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8ubeq8$cgm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A0D38E9.BB87D8CD@mindspring.com> <8uoq5g$of6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8up1j4$uqe$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a110356$1@pull.gecm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-11-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: * Martin Dowie wrote: >er, you realize that the "'Bit_Order" here is unnecessary? try it - it >will make no difference if you comment them out (or make them the >same) as they simply provide a way of referencing bits >(i.e. High_Order_First = bit(0)MSB, Low_Order_First = bit(0)LSB) >and you don't reference any bit positions! Thanx. I still try to understand that subject.