From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10261c,cfbb90c56a313e70 X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,cfbb90c56a313e70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) Subject: Re: From extended Pascals to Ada 95 guide Date: 2000/08/28 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 663482202 References: <8o3s2a$9ph$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8o4bfq$v0h$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> <39A655BE.18E89020@maths.unine.ch> <39A668AB.26F88375@maths.unine.ch> <39A6ABD9.634308AA@earthlink.net> <39AA2B85.F9A917E8@maths.unine.ch> <39AA6526.A33A4330@acm.org> Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (FreeBSD) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pascal.misc Date: 2000-08-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <39AA6526.A33A4330@acm.org>, Marin D. Condic wrote: >Marco van de Voort wrote: >> >> When I had to design a new language, I would add it I think, because it >> seems nice. But to change to another language (... ADA..) for it? > >Well, not just for that one feature. Just remember that if you like >Pascal you'd likely feel very much at home with Ada. I do. But to program apps, not to create academical perfect programs. I also think portability issues are often severely overrated. >Ada is kind of like >"Pascal++" in that the syntax is very much like Pascal's, but it cures >certain ills that existed there and then added a *lot* more stuff to >make the language much more powerful. Over standard pascal, or over Delphi?