From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,39e272d357c68416 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mnh@thor.com (Mark Hertel) Subject: Re: Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java? Date: 1999/12/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 558764351 References: <11f733ec.57d88b68@usw-ex0107-042.remarq.com> <384127A5.61431A14@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk> <0a0133f8.3baf10c0@usw-ex0101-001.remarq.com> <01a2e3cb.4316300b@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com> <82638m$cif$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999Dec2.123736.1@eisner> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shore.net X-Trace: news.shore.net 944780240 207.244.124.103 (Thu, 09 Dec 1999 17:57:20 EST) Organization: Shore.Net/Eco Software, Inc; (info@shore.net) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.6 (UNIX) Reply-To: mnh@thor.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 17:57:20 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:37:36 GMT, Larry Kilgallen wrote: >In article <82638m$cif$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison writes: > >> Averstar and ACT are newer, but that really just means that their main >> corporate focus is still on their compilers. > >If Averstar has compilers as their main focus, somebody forgot to tell >their web designer. And Averstar absorbed Intermetrics, the company that lost to Groupe Bull for the original Ada development. They aren't "newer" than Rational or Aonix. -- Mark Hertel mnh@thor.com