From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38d1fe109cd56c87 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk (Aidan Skinner) Subject: Re: GNAT, LINUX, KDE Date: 1999/12/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 555497051 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219 References: <81k70k$197u$1@news.gate.net> <81lkb2$mra3@ftp.kvaerner.com> <81u97e$qkr1@ftp.kvaerner.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 944084540 nnrp-09:26994 NO-IDENT skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219 Organization: None User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) Reply-To: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 17:22:53 +0100, Tarjei Jensen wrote: >Aidan Skinner wrote: >For my taste AdaSockets contains too much C flavour. I guessed this, that's why I suggestted building it on top of AdaSockets, you then don't have to do the low level stuff and can concentrate on the public interface itself >>>I have discovered that is Ada vendors that supported interface.c were >required >>I think those sort of things are more in a POSIX stylee... >It may be Posix, but they are still useful for socket programming. Yes, but since not all systems that Ada is implemented on is POSIX, or, indeed, POSIX-like supplying them shouldn't be required by the language. - Aidan -- http://www.skinner.demon.co.uk/aidan/ http://www.gla.ac.uk/Clubs/WebSoc/~9704075s/ "I could always suspend a few hundred accounts and watch what happens"