From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4a14ea3a6faca74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Subject: Re: Generic abstracts Date: 1999/11/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 552897975 Distribution: world Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: [I'm doing the Ingrid.�] * Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: >In my current developemnt I came across this problem again. ftp://ftp.iks-jena.de/pub/mitarb/lutz/ada/types/ Classic data structures like List, Hash, ... are usually implemented as a generic package over an item type. They result in a new component type containing the items. This packages embell the items to be managed by a component type. So it allowes an item to be a member of multiple structures at the same time without expecting anything special from it. It should be possible to create a hash and two lists over a set of unconstraint abstract types containing task components. YFYI. 1 "Doing the Ingrid" is a common phrase in de.ALL, the international German speaking usenet groups. It refers to a penetrant girl polluting some groups by a series of recursive followups.