From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9240e56bacaf630 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Subject: Re: Generic abstract procedures Date: 1999/10/15 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 536969797 Distribution: world Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <38062215_1@news1.prserv.net> <380685f5_4@news1.prserv.net> Followup-To: poster Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: * Matthew Heaney wrote: >(Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote: >> I'm going to implement a Iterator pattern. >[snip] >> My question is: Does anybody already solved such a problem in an elegant way? > >See my article "Iterator and Factory Method Patterns Combined," in the >Nov 1998 design patterns archive, for some ideas. Of course I read it before trying anything to implement. Many thanx. The large article about multiple inheritance in this group yesterday is wonderful. A lot of ideas.