From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebf0c2e0d9df034 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: gisle@apal.ii.uib.no (Gisle S�lensminde) Subject: Re: Ada95 + FORTRAN 77 Date: 1999/09/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 521626996 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: Organization: University of Bergen, Norway Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Preben Randhol wrote: > >Hello I'm quite new to Ada95. Have started reading John Barnes: >Programming in Ada 95. > >I have read (think it was on the net) that one can bind Fortran and >Ada95 together. Does anybody know if one can use Fortran 77? > >I have a calculation program written in FORTRAN 77 and want to just >make a graphical interface to it so that it will be easier to do >calculations. I want to use Ada95 and GTK+. So I'm wondering if >anybody know of a working example for the Ada95 - FORTRAN 77 >connection (don't have to be any GUI) that I could look at? There is a binding to the LAPACK Fortran library at the contrib area at the main site for the GNAT public version. ftp://cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/contrib/lapack-ada/ > >Thanks in advance. > >PS: Ada's verbose syntax threw me back first time I looked at it (a >year ago or so), but after meddling a bit with C++ I see why verbose >is better. Also I didn't get GNAT the compiler working on Linux back >then, now it works like charm :-) > >-- >Preben Randhol oO "Don't think about domination, think >[randhol@pvv.org] .` ; about freedom, it doesn't dominate." >[www.pvv.org/~randhol/] \ G -- RMS, LinuxWorld 1999. > `_) n o m e -- -- Gisle S�lensminde ( gisle@ii.uib.no )