From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cb4fe85a63285efc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk (Aidan Skinner)
Subject: Re: Any have GNAT running on linux
Date: 1999/07/23
Message-ID: <slrn7pft3s.hv0.aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 504495230
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219
References: <378A95E9.FF5DEE51@home.com> <37919764.48840A3C@magic.fr>
 <37933F96.2D74@worldnet.att.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 932755500 nnrp-07:6427 NO-IDENT
 skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219
Organization: None
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX)
Reply-To: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 15:09:10 +0000, James Bean
<Jim-bean@worldnet.att.net> wrote: 

>My 2 cents worth of strategy is to stay with RH 5.2 and just update the
>kernel as required (am presently running 2.3.6 OK).  RH even has a very

There are rpms of GNAT 3.11p linked from
http://www.cs.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/linux-ada/ that run quite happily on
this RedHat 6.0 box (just as they ran on it when it was running Redhat
5.2 and 5.0) and don't interfere with egcs (which is the default C
compiler on 6, a tad irritatingly IMO).

Perhaps this should go in the FAQ?

- Aidan
-- 
http://www.skinner.demon.co.uk/aidan/
How much can could ICANN can if ICANN could can-can?