From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3d20c60e0efe24b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk (Aidan Skinner) Subject: Re: Writing Book, Need Ada Ammunition Date: 1999/07/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 504495220 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219 References: <1999Jul22.141618.1@eisner> <7n7rq3$h1g$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 932755498 nnrp-07:6427 NO-IDENT skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219 Organization: None User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX) Reply-To: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-07-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 22 Jul 1999 19:35:31 GMT, Markus Kuhn wrote: >The probably most important aspect of this book should be that it >does not only treat the Ada language along as all the other Ada When I origionally discovered the outline mode of Emacs, shortly after I got Learning GNU Emacs, the second thing I did was write an outline for a GNU/Linux-Ada tutorial bookything. I've since added bits to it, but haven't gotten around to sitting down and filling it out. I probably should do at some point... Actually, I'll clean it up, fill out a few bits and then post an outline on the ALT list... >There exists no single book yet that talks about POSIX.5 and FLORIST. This reminds me, does anybody know if the POSIX-Ada standard has been printed yet, and if so where can I order it from? >I would certainly buy it. I'd probably get the university library to buy it, read it quickly and then stick it back, but then again I'm a poor student who prefers to have things on his monitor than in his lap. (did that sound right?) - Aidan (maybe I should sleep...) -- http://www.skinner.demon.co.uk/aidan/ How much can could ICANN can if ICANN could can-can?