From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8f32ee66492cfc72
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk (Aidan Skinner)
Subject: Re: Catchy name for library
Date: 1999/05/13
Message-ID: <slrn7jm4c8.i2.aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 477482079
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219
References: <37383ab5@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <37384956.CBC6B6C7@pwfl.com>
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 926615491 nnrp-12:17945 NO-IDENT
 skinner.demon.co.uk:158.152.76.219
Organization: skinner.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 1999-05-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 11 May 1999 11:14:30 -0400, Marin David Condic
<condicma@bogon.pwfl.com> wrote: 

>IMHO, if you pick some subset of the proposed component library and come
>up with a good implementation, it will likely find acceptance.

On a related note, what are peoples opinion of the naming of the
nntp/smtp packages in libra? They are currently under
Libra.ARPA.[NNTP|SMTP], as they both pass ARPA messages from RFC 822,
but it has been suggested that it isn't entirely clear to people who are
relatively new to internet programming what ARPA is.

- Aidan
-- 
http://www.skinner.demon.co.uk
Real men whistle ed commands at 300 baud into a can.