From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b99334cb89bcb335 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: f9437,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public X-Google-Thread: f9437,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public From: schlegel@pella.informatik.uni-rostock.de (Juergen Schlegelmilch) Subject: Re: RFD: comp.object.moderated moderated Date: 1998/10/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 400947652 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <907918039.22235@isc.org> <36210B47.6A5FE581@eiffel.com> <363314e1.131092310@enews.newsguy.com> <701rtn$3k7$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Organization: University of Rostock, Germany Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: schlegel@Informatik.Uni-Rostock.de Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 14 Oct 1998 09:46:31 GMT, Kevin Szabo wrote: >The article never reached my server, but lots of follow ups did. Could >it have been a forgery that was cancelled by the perpetrator? I checked with dejanews, and the original article is _not_ at dejanews, so I cannot check its message ID. From the replies (References: header as well as message bodies) I conclude that it had message ID <36210B47.6A5FE581@eiffel.com> --- which Bertrand Meyer did indeed cancel (message ID <6vr2gt$mcs$1@news.rain.org>). Whether it was a forgery, or Dr. Meyer realized that it may not be up to his usual standards, cannot be determined from dejanews. Personally, I believe that message was forged by a troll. Regards, J�rgen -- /-----------------------------------------------------------------------------\ Juergen Schlegelmilch http://www.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~schlegel Database Research Group mailto:schlegel@Informatik.Uni-Rostock.de University of Rostock, Computer Science Department, 18051 Rostock, Germany