From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: jdege@jdege.visi.com (Jeffrey C. Dege) Subject: Re: Software landmines (was: Why C++ is successful) Date: 1998/08/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 383219304 References: <35cb8058.645630787@news.ne.mediaone.net> <902934874.2099.0.nnrp-10.c246a717@news.demon.co.uk> <6r1glm$bvh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6r9f8h$jtm$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6renh8$ga7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6rf59b$2ud$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35dc6bf4.5328251@news.erols.com> <35dfb9a8.4685477@news.erols.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 22:48:41 CDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-08-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 21 Aug 1998 01:29:16 GMT, Larry Brasfield wrote: > >Is there any language in ordinary use that permits >a goto to cross a procedure boundary? If so, how >are goto target name scopes defined? If not, why >make so much of trying to avoid such goto's? C's setjmp()/longjmp() functions provide for a goto() across procedure boundaries. Or at least from a function to a function that called it. -- "It is not Microsoft's monopoly that I object to, it is the mediocrity of their products." -- Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle