From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Olivier.Galibert@mines.u-nancy.fr (Olivier Galibert) Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/06/28 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 253211946 References: <33B014E3.3343@no.such.com> <5oqp9s$7vj$1@news.nyu.edu> Organization: Usenet Cabale Hysterique Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-06-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert Dewar wrote: >[...] >There are three kinds of versions of GNAT > >[version 1 and 2 are distributed under option (a)] > >Third. Wavefront releases. [...] >These wavefront releases are distributed using option (b) in the GPL. That >is we provide objects only, with an offer to provide the sources on CD ROM >for a copying charge. Option (b) says : b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, i.e., this says "any third party". This includes Richard Cole, doesn't it ? OG.