From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-07 08:44:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!hub1.nntpserver.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110092211.a69a5f@posting.google.com> <3C0E933F.86CA2FB8@usa.com> <5ee5b646.0112052127.421f6d4@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0112061759.b60b970@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:44:08 EST Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:44:08 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17578 Date: 2001-12-07T16:44:08+00:00 List-Id: In article <5ee5b646.0112061759.b60b970@posting.google.com>, Robert Dewar says... >Of course what would be nice to see is both Ron and T.E.D >devoting their efforts to helpful contributions to this >public tree. If they just spent a little bit of the effort >they spent on posting here on CLA on that worthy effort :-) I'd certianly like to help out in this effort, and indeed may one day do so. But unfortuntately I have a day job and 2 kids (soon to be 3), and several other Free Software projects ongoing. I have to be fairly judicious about how to use the free 6 hours or so I get a week. I'm terribly sorry if you feel that this has left Gnat out in the cold so far. I assure you its nothing personal. Given all that, I actually have attempted one 3.0 gcc/Gnat build. Unfortunately it was on a rather slow Win95 laptop. Let's say that isn't exactly the "ideal" development enviroment. :-) I'm sure sometime I'll get around to trying it out on a real system. >Actually we are getting lots of useful contributions, though not many >from the regulars on CLA. I actually lurk from time to time in the gcc mailing list, and have indeed seen lots of talk about submissions from non-ACT people, which is one of the reasons I no longer have any concern about "wavefronts". Very few of these people are folks who were not familiar to me from C.L.A. But I guess you can look at the glass as half-empty if you like. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.