From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,319049242a1d61c0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "John Merryweather Cooper" <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net>
Subject: Re: Ada and OS/2
Date: 2000/05/10
Message-ID: <shjiqe9gd58170@corp.supernews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 621729242
References: <3911CE27.808923F9@mailandnews.com> <391723D2.326623A9@gmx.de>
 <39173F50.DEC6D313@mailandnews.com> <3919D5C5.CC1F055B@gmx.de>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Yes, it works quite well.  Cygwin and GNAT for WinDoze on the otherhand need
to be "kept at arms length" from each other.

jmc
======================
"Christoph Seelhorst" <christoph.seelhorst@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:3919D5C5.CC1F055B@gmx.de...
> What seems another great thing to me is the fact that you can combine Gnat
with
> the other variations of emx, e.g. GCC , g++ and g77.  Well, I THINK it
will
> work, I have not really made in-depth testing there.  If anyone has
experience
> reports, I'd be glad to know.
>
> Cheers,  Christoph
>
>
> David Dousette wrote:
>
> > I was having a few troubles getting it set up at first, and I had a few
> > misconceptions regarding GNU development tools.  But I had assistance
via
> > email and a closer read of the readme file, and I also had a lot of my
> > misconceptions cleared up, so now I can't wait till I get to the chapter
in
> > my Ada book when it tells me I can touch the keyboard... ;^)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Dave
> >
> > Christoph Seelhorst wrote:
> >
> > > I have checked the Ada market since quite some years, but I do not
know
> > > of any other OS/2 Ada compiler.
> > > Years ago I tried the (then) Alsys Personal Ada for Windows, but it
did
> > > not cooperate with WinOS2.
> > > So it seems that Gnat is our only choice, but what is bad with it??
> > >
> > > Cheers, Christoph
> > >
> > > David Dousette wrote:
> > >
> > > > Are there any other options for an Ada 95 compiler for OS/2 besides
> > > > GNAT?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > David
>