From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6248cc9ba00e302f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-13 12:56:58 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Generics and null procedures
Date: 13 Apr 2003 14:56:56 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <sfwnjkDEa3Cv@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <b7cb0a$8hd$1@news.onet.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1050263809 20626 192.135.80.34 (13 Apr 2003
 19:56:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 19:56:49 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36122
Date: 2003-04-13T14:56:56-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <b7cb0a$8hd$1@news.onet.pl>, "kat-Zygfryd" <6667@wp.pl> writes:
> generic
> (...)
> with procedure Proc;
> package Pack is....
> ---
> procedure NullProc is
> begin null; end NullProc;
> ---
> package NewPack is new Pack(NullProc);
> ---
> 
> My question is: is the compiler smart enough
> to ignore all calls to NullProc in Pack, or is
> it going to call this obsolete procedure?

Certainly that depends on what compiler, which you have not indicated.