From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,db5d995d03f4fb4c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-06 11:17:19 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!chi1.webusenet.com!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe02.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Elliott <DavidElliott@BellSouth.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What Can We do About AdaHome.com
Message-ID: <sfh2jvgrof5mgv963fvjng12kihajcb4tq@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:03:59 EDT
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:17:16 -0400
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41222
Date: 2003-08-06T14:17:16-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Slightly off topic:

As I am new to ADA, I stumbled on the AdaHome site and read through the material I could 
find.  With some of the comments from the threads of this subject, this is per chance not the
best site to be using.

Can someone recommend a site?

Also, I am looking for a Windows IDE.  I pulled down the Windows 95/98/NT/2000 version of GNAT 
http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/languages/ada/compiler/gnat/distrib/3.14p/winnt/gnat-3.14p-nt.exe 
and installed it.  However this is just a debugger.  Can someone recommend a Windows IDE as well.

Thanks,
Dave
DavidElliott@BellSouth.net


On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:02:48 -0700, in comp.lang.ada you wrote:

>One of my students used AdaHome.com as a bibliographic
>reference in a recent paper turned in  to me.   I noted that
>AdaHome is no longer a viable source of up-to-date information
>about Ada.   He corrected the reference.
>
>The problem is that AdaHome continues to be a bad choice
>for anyone trying to  get current information about Ada.  How
>can we correct this problem?
>
>Richard Riehle