From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,XPRIO
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1fe3e1cb632f5d31,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "John Merryweather Cooper" <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net>
Subject: Porting JGNAT public version 1.0p to OS/2
Date: 2000/04/03
Message-ID: <sehps9eueop30@corp.supernews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 606182303
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Well, I've had to "hack" the makefile, but I've gotten a good part of the
package to compile.  I believe some of the bugs in the EMX implementation of
make are showing through since the "clean" makefile wouldn't pass the .c
source files to the compiler ($< was returning " ").  JVMLIST.EXE,
JVM2ADA.EXE, etc. fail on linking--it seems they cause a compile/link of
osint.ads/.adb which in turn wants a-adaint.c.  But manually adding
a-adaint.o to the module list cause "duplicate references errors.  For each
module that fails to link, I get three undefined symbol errors pointing to
functions whose source (potentially) is found in a-adaint.c:

_to_canonical_file_list_init
_to_canonical_file_list_next
_to_canonical_file_list_free

Since these utilities are supposed to only rely on the standard GNAT
library, are these symbols supposed to be defined in libgnat.a (but are not
in the EMX-OS/2 version--so that I need to port them to the standard
library) or is something else going haywire?  :)

Back to the slave pits . . .

jmc