From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebc19d379b37caae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Vladimir Olensky" Subject: Re: Type size vs. actual size difference. Date: 2000/03/20 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 600034357 References: <8b5hhp$pvv1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com> <8b5n8c$kkl$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Date: 2000-03-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote in message <8b5n8c$kkl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>... >In article , > "Vladimir Olensky" wrote: >> Topic name was: Size (novice question). > >(not relevant stuff snipped) > >Vladimir, you translated 214 bytes into 214 bits in your >reading, and thus answered a completely different question! Oops, I see . Probably I was a little bit tired and a wrong trigger switched on in my mind :-) Thanks, Vladimir Olensky