From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,79f5c8d5de610eef X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-26 11:34:12 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!news.kei.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!sgiblab!pacbell.com!well!barrnet.net!rational.com!ohno.ppp.verdix.com!user From: sarge@Rational.Com (Matthew C. Sargent) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Verdix VADS ADA or GNU ADA on an SGI... Date: Mon, 26 Sep 1994 14:08:32 -0500 Organization: Rational Software Corporation Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <1994Sep22.143838.388@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <366vb4$gbr@dayuc.dayton.saic.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ohno.ppp.verdix.com Date: 1994-09-26T14:08:32-05:00 List-Id: In article <366vb4$gbr@dayuc.dayton.saic.com>, James Hopper wrote: > In article <1994Sep22.143838.388@mksol.dseg.ti.com> martin connor, > connor@mksol.dseg.ti.com writes: > >We are in the process of selecting an ADA compiler for an SGI > workstation. > >The engineers want VERIX VADS, the accountants want GNU ADA (based on > cost). That's Rational Software Corporation VADS compiler. The VADS on the SGI includes flavors that allow you to map threads on the SGI to Ada tasks. Check it out, I don't think you would be sorry. > >Has anyone used either of these on an SGI workstation? Does GNU ADA have > >tools, or support? In the long run would the VERDIX ADA be a better > choice? > [comments snipped...] -- Matthew C. Sargent | Their MY opinions. MINE! Nobody Rational Software Corporation | elses! You can't keep them. Give sarge@Rational.com | them BACK. Waaaaaaaaaaa! I want 804-491-0372 | my opinons BACK. Mommmmmmmmy! 804-425-5859 Fax |