From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-21 00:44:15 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-atanamir.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail
From: Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT: Nuclear Waste (Was Re-Marketing Ada)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:47:17 +0100
Message-ID: <sajrrv43irru5va8nai4crt0rvbijqppbu@4ax.com>
References: <bebbba07.0311161831.bce38a5@posting.google.com>
 <Az7ub.3669$ZF1.458179@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <oH8ub.4782$n56.638@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <jL9ub.34$2z1.1706@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <I_aub.9262$3o6.6712@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <49cbf610.0311191248.7eb48a43@posting.google.com>
 <bebbba07.0311192231.48b3056a@posting.google.com>
 <SqmdnVW4jrTaViGiRVn-sA@comcast.com>
 <jioprvkn6v025drp4qf1iuolqdto3rtd89@4ax.com>
 <bpj0di$2a8b$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-atanamir.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.116)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1069404253 60487732 212.79.194.116 (16 [77047])
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2783
Date: 2003-11-21T09:47:17+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:16:16 -0500, "Chad R. Meiners"
<crmeiners@hotmail.com> wrote:

>"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
>news:jioprvkn6v025drp4qf1iuolqdto3rtd89@4ax.com...
>> However there is a true long term perspective problem with nuclear
>> energy. Nuclear energy shifts the temperature balance, because it is a
>> source of energy indendent from what we are receiving from the sun. At
>> the present level it is nothing and will remain nothing for a very
>> long period of time. But some day it will be necessary to find a way
>> to radiate the heat dissipated in the atmosphere into space.
>
>How would that compare to the extra energy that the earth traps from
>increase of CO2 in the air?
>;-)

In a long term perspective, there is no alternative to nuclear energy.
CO2 emission is rather a short term problem. However it illustrates a
rather obvous fact that old technology causes more damage for less
gain. It is amazing how greens became an obstacle to resolving CO2
problem.

--
Regards,
Dmitry Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de