From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8da181ade72859cf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Brian May Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: timeouts References: Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:03:19 +1000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:PiFjRcNM/2w35DhdNKjwPgScQOM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl-202-173-153-89.vic.westnet.com.au X-Trace: news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com 1093593799 202.173.153.89 (27 Aug 2004 18:03:19 +1000) X-Complaints-To: abuse@pipenetworks.com X-Abuse-Info: Please forward all headers to enable your complaint to be properly processed. Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mel.connect.com.au!duster.adelaide.on.net!news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3070 Date: 2004-08-27T18:03:19+10:00 List-Id: >>>>> "tmoran" == tmoran writes: tmoran> Is the current GCC Gnat more robust than 3.15p, or is it tmoran> still beta? ie, should we (Windows) 3.15p users switch, tmoran> or continue waiting? I get the distinct impression that it is now time to switch... PS. Thanks to everyone who has so far attempted to help me with this issue. -- Brian May