From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8da181ade72859cf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Brian May Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: timeouts References: Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:29:17 +1000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ltPucFLtTpPlcdtDEx4PH+THDMI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl-202-173-153-89.vic.westnet.com.au X-Trace: news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com 1093174156 202.173.153.89 (22 Aug 2004 21:29:16 +1000) X-Complaints-To: abuse@pipenetworks.com X-Abuse-Info: Please forward all headers to enable your complaint to be properly processed. Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.netspace.net.au!news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2923 Date: 2004-08-22T21:29:17+10:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Leake writes: Stephen> Are the log messages all output by one thread (a logging Stephen> thread)? If not, it would be easy for a low-priority Stephen> thread to start a message, get interrupted by a Stephen> high-priority thread, and thus get messages that appear Stephen> to be out of time order. No, in this case all log messages were output by one thread, only. There are other threads running, but I turned off logging in order to simplify debugging. hmmm... I probably should work out a way to separate log entries by thread though... I wonder what the easiest way is to do this... -- Brian May