From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Brian May Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada? References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <461B52A6.20102@obry.net> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:43:49 +1000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tmQL+JYiYWET3F3WBOVvsjRqoaE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au X-Trace: quokka.wn.com.au 1176248590 202.173.153.89 (11 Apr 2007 07:43:10 +0800) X-Complaints-To: abuse@westnet.com.au Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14899 Date: 2007-04-11T09:43:49+10:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Obry writes: Pascal> Why do they like fighting a language all the time People I have talked to avoid Ada because of the perception (real or otherwise) that you have to fight the language all the time, and there is only one way of doing things[1]. Not that I agree with this reasoning. Notes: [1] Unlike in, say Perl, where there are many ways of stating exactly the same thing. -- Brian May