From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-18 00:50:49 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com.MISMATCH!newsfeed!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news2.e.nsc.no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" <tarjei@online.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com>
 <b9gko2$pub@library1.airnews.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305091549.48b9c5d9@posting.google.com>
 <dstanbro-DDA263.20492210052003@mec2.bigpond.net.au>
 <ZpGva.13$1Q1.6@read3.inet.fi>
 <7507f79d.0305121629.5b8b7369@posting.google.com>
 <ln0wa.54$a03.44@read3.inet.fi>
 <9fa75d42.0305130643.526f61c2@posting.google.com>
 <nNmdnZ46ROWIwFyjXTWcqg@gbronline.com>
 <9fa75d42.0305140436.534f7151@posting.google.com>
 <ba067m$iph$1@south.jnrs.ja.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305160440.7846d18c@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbca29h.gve.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <GMrxa.13181$8g5.205254@news2.e.nsc.no>
 <slrnbccqiq.rve.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
Subject: Re: Quality systems (Was: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada
 mandate, and why it collapsed and died))
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <sXGxa.13293$8g5.207440@news2.e.nsc.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.67.235.207
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@telenor.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 09:50:48 MEST
X-Trace: news2.ulv.nextra.no 1053244248 130.67.235.207
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 09:50:12 +0200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37466
Date: 2003-05-18T09:50:12+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Preben Randhol wrote:
> Tarjei T. Jensen wrote:
> > That is pre-nt4. In general windows from nt4 onwards has been good
enough
> > for office use.
>
> pre-nt4? There has been several win-32 releases post-nt that are not
> stable. Not even for Office use.
>
> But for server use win-32 is not stable.

It is. We have several database, file and print servers. All running windows
2000. As far as reliability is concerned, they work good enough.

But then we don't install every piece of software on the internet on these
machines.

> > Windows 2000 has been quite solid. Windows XP is better.
>
> Well, Windows XP has given me BSOD 5-6 times.

Then we ask: what software have you installed on this machine?


greetings,