From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bcf30769d6d9599 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-06 08:42:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news2.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "McDoobie" Subject: Re: Ada OS talk (was: ADA os talk)(and now is "About you guys".) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: User-Agent: Pan/0.8.1beta4 (Unix) X-No-Productlinks: Yes Message-ID: Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 15:42:16 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.109.49 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news2 999790936 24.0.109.49 (Thu, 06 Sep 2001 08:42:16 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 08:42:16 PDT Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12809 Date: 2001-09-06T15:42:16+00:00 List-Id: In article , "M. A. Alves" wrote: >> > Why not set a goal of a kernel that handles scheduling of processes >> > tasks on from one to N processors? > > The resulting product would be fine, but to get things started in the > current context you should aim low. 1 processor. More over, a specific > processor and architecture (PC Pentium I?). Also, a small set of > devices: ROM, RAM, keyboard, screen. That was the ADX project approach. > Even thou they missed the Ada-France contest, I still think they did > something > (guys?) and that the approach was the correct one for an hobby OS. > I dont know about you guys...but I'm installing Plan9 so as to research it for ideas that can be incorporated into an Ada Kernel/OS. Wouldn't hurt to dig through some of these other systems for ideas that we can make better. Laters. McDoobie chris@dont.spam.me