From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f16a645029bb2cdd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The GNU Ada compiler Date: 19 Dec 2005 14:14:09 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <8352037.GvZVdQSXN4@linux1.krischik.com> <10516182.EDYboSzEoF@linux1.krischik.com> <1500332.U7CjsdsL0l@linux1.krischik.com> <1691618.MhViCBI7GN@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1135023228 7613 192.135.80.34 (19 Dec 2005 20:13:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6936 Date: 2005-12-19T14:14:09-06:00 List-Id: In article <1691618.MhViCBI7GN@linux1.krischik.com>, Martin Krischik writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: > >> In article <1500332.U7CjsdsL0l@linux1.krischik.com>, Martin Krischik >> writes: >> >>> I never thought there would be a demand for OpenVMS - thinking that any >>> OpenVMS shop using Ada would have GNAT/Pro or DecAda or both. >>> >>> However, I also know that there is a special OpenVMS patch to GNAT/Pro >>> which is more then 700kB in size. Do I have to say more? >> >> Yes you do have to say more to communicate to those of us who do not >> have any experience with GNAT. > > Well, you don't actually need experience with GNAT. You need experience with > diff and patch ;-). I presume you mean something other than the standard VMS utilities PATCH (which is VAX-only) and DIFFERENCES. > There are 700kb worth of special changes to the standart GCC in order to > make GNAT work pleasantly on OpenVMS. So just compiling a standart GCC on > OpenVMS might not be enough to have an well working Ada on OpenVMS. So the GNAT which is on the publically accessible source repository does not represent something that _ever_ worked on VMS ?