From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_WORDY,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b8748382fcfacc1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Ken Garlington" <Ken.Garlington@computer.org>
Subject: Re: friend classes in ada95
Date: 2000/04/21
Message-ID: <sF5M4.205$X55.17110@news.flash.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 614137677
References: <8dh37m$qef$2@wanadoo.fr> <3B5L4.1317$B43.116109@news.pacbell.net>
 <38FD1830.949F5E81@mindspring.com> <38FD1C9E.7C2B7756@research.canon.com.au>
 <Ft9rpt.4AF@news.boeing.com> <8dldqi$mb7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38FE365D.31C893A6@acm.org> <8dliaf$r6k$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38FF804E.BB59D751@acm.org> <8dq859$sae$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net
X-Trace: news.flash.net 956360408 216.215.67.240 (Fri,
 21 Apr 2000 18:40:08 CDT)
Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 18:40:08 CDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Robert Dewar" <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8dq859$sae$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <38FF804E.BB59D751@acm.org>,
>   jrcarter@acm.org wrote:
> > and I have seen
> > plenty of "OO" code that had nothing object oriented about it.
>
>
> OO *means* object oriented, so the above is a contradiction
> in terms.

But does "OO" (vs. OO) mean object oriented? (e.g., the Mafia "persuaded"
the witness to not testify.)