From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,21a8034919747a69 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Splitting packages in per-procedure separate files References: <2007021017501616807-sjs@essexacuk> From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:08:54 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oUW2yXJlyjXdX0rWX4JKpi+AJTs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.74.59.229 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1171202618 88.74.59.229 (11 Feb 2007 15:03:38 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9260 Date: 2007-02-11T15:08:54+01:00 List-Id: Francesco Bochicchio writes: > This could be done by hand in at most a (very boring) week (but I'd say > three days could be enough), so I can't spend too much effort in > automating this task, except for: > a) preparing for future similar activities > b) having sligtly more fun. Since you will b just doing it once: You could use awk (or perl) ans just do heuristic pattern matching on the procedure headers to split the packages in question. Those cases that won't yield to the approach you could correct manually. Regards -- Markus