From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e4b2dce209393666 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Vladimir Olensky" Subject: Re: Business Week (12/6/99 issue) article on Software Quality Date: 1999/12/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 558754052 References: <82hk54$cbc$1@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net> <82kv5j$k6p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <384eabe7.13628242@news.netidea.com> <82mlvh$mb0$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <82ochh$27p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <82opns$7k2$1@nntp4.atl.mindspring.net> <384ffd52.888393602@newsnew.draper.com> <82p3vo$k8v$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Date: 1999-12-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Richard D Riehle wrote in message <82p3vo$k8v$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>... >The real disappointment for me is that no one appreciated my reply to >the Business Week article. No, I do not think so. Those who appreciated just did not reply criticizing your style ;-) >Also, I suspect that those non-software >people who read it, if it is published, will understand the point I am >making without being defensive about the terminology. Only the software >practitioners are likely to object. Interesting... But understandable. Regards, Vladimir Olensky